So the Chief Medical Officer thinks we should set a minimum tax level for each unit of alchohol. 50p is his figure. 
In theory I think it’s a good idea but I also understand the argument put forward by the opponents of the plan i.e. that it’s not fair on those of us who drink sensibly and in moderation. After all, we all know the drinks that cause most of the problems.
My suggestion is that we do increase tax levels but only on those drinks we know are consumed for the sole reason of getting off-your-face as quickly as possible i.e. cheap white ciders, super strength lagers and what used to called alchopops. People don’t drink these products because they enjoy the taste. They are bought for the sole purpose of getting drunk as quickly as possible. I would either tax these products to the hilt or even ban them. What about all the jobs that would be lost I hear you cry? Well the same breweries could be used to produce good quality, lower alcohol drinks that people might enjoy. From a business point of view it makes sense; instead of having a product that people only consume from the age of 15-18 why not produce a product that consumers can enjoy all their lives?
Working in a prison service pharmacy I see scripts for newly imprisoned alchoholics every day. I bet if I asked them what they drink it wouldn’t be a nice 1983 Saint Emilion, but the off-you-head-as-quick-as-can products mentioned above.
Cheers!
Related posts:
- Welcome to PL-UK 2.0!
- Locum Pharmacist raising money for a good cause
- 10 business secrets for Locum Pharmacists
Interesting? Useful? Why not share it!
or subscribe to receive new posts via email or using RSSTags: alcohol, drink, prison pharmacy
