<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>PL-UK The Pharmacy Recruitment Specialists &#187; NPA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pluk.co.uk/tag/npa/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pluk.co.uk</link>
	<description>Pharmacy Recruitment Agency</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 15:53:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Pharmacy Voice</title>
		<link>http://www.pluk.co.uk/2010/pharmacy-voice/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pluk.co.uk/2010/pharmacy-voice/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2010 10:56:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shaun</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Default]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pharmacy Voice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PLUK/PL-UK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RPS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rpsgb]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pluk.co.uk/2010/pharmacy-voice/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NPA, CCA and IMP come together as Pharmnacy Voice. Now we need the RPS and PDA to come together as Pharmacist Voice or even better British Pharmacist Association and/or Royal College of Pharmacy http://www.pjonline.com/news/trade_organisations_launch_unified_voice_for_pharmacy No related posts.


No related posts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NPA, CCA and IMP come together as Pharmnacy Voice.<br />
Now we need the RPS and PDA to come together as Pharmacist Voice or even better British Pharmacist Association and/or Royal College of Pharmacy</p>
<p>http://www.pjonline.com/news/trade_organisations_launch_unified_voice_for_pharmacy</p>


<p>No related posts.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pluk.co.uk/2010/pharmacy-voice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Give me strength!</title>
		<link>http://www.pluk.co.uk/2010/give-me-strength/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pluk.co.uk/2010/give-me-strength/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2010 10:42:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shaun</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pharmacy News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PLUK Company News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[COALITION]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hospital locum pharmacist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LOCUM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LOCUM PHARMACIST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NHS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PSNC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[QUANGO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rpsgb]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pluk.co.uk/?p=742</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Coalition are having a bonfire of the Quango's today. Can't we have a quango of the representative bodies in the pharmacy profession? 


No related posts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just when things seem to be getting better for pharmacists the old chestnut of self- protection rears it&#8217;s head. Responding to ex- Secretary of health, Alan Milburn&#8217;s comments at the Pharmacy Show that Pharmacy needs to speak with one voice to achieve it&#8217;s potential we get this response via the C+D website</p>
<p><a title="Pharmacy" href="http://www.chemistanddruggist.co.uk/articledetails?groupId=10242&amp;CMPI_SHARED_articleId=4357387&amp;CMPI_SHARED_CommentArticleId=4357387&amp;CMPI_SHARED_ImageArticleId=4357387&amp;CMPI_SHARED_ToolsArticleId=4357387&amp;CMPI_SHARED_articleIdRelated=4357387&amp;version=1.0&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter" target="_blank">C+D article</a></p>
<p>Wanting to show that pharmacy speaks with one voice comments from PSNC, NPA and RPS!!!!!!</p>
<p>In one article the problem for pharmacy is shown in stark contrast! All these bodies full of their own importance and why always the talk of pharmacy not pharmacists.</p>
<p>Politicians and the public couldn&#8217;t care less about pharmacy in the same way they couldn&#8217;t care less about joinery, recruitment, banking or any other profession or trade. What they do care about is people i.e. pharmacist, joiners bankers (OK, maybe not.) Politicians and the public care about flesh and blood, not bricks and mortar.</p>
<p>Please, for the sake of pharmacists like me, sort yourselves out. PSNC merge with the NPA, the CCA, the independent multiples group, the national association of pharmacies with the word Road in the title etc etc etc and speak about your business  concerns.</p>
<p>The RPS merge with the PDA and speak for pharmacists, speak about how pharmacists can support doctors, nurses, opticians and social workers and we might, eventually fulfil our potential as health professionals because you know what, Alan Milburn was so right and we all know it!</p>
<p>The Coalition are having a bonfire of the Quango&#8217;s today. Can&#8217;t we have a quango of the representative bodies in the pharmacy profession? Just think how powerful a business lobby and a pharmacist lobby could be!</p>


<p>No related posts.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pluk.co.uk/2010/give-me-strength/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Don&#8217;t forget to vote</title>
		<link>http://www.pluk.co.uk/2010/dont-forget-to-vote/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pluk.co.uk/2010/dont-forget-to-vote/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 18:15:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shaun</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Default]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[english pharmacy board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PHARMACIST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PSNC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pluk.co.uk/2010/dont-forget-to-vote/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have just cast my vote online for the English Pharmacy Board Elections. I have voted for those pharmacists who I believe will represent the interests of individual pharmacist and not those of &#8216;Big Pharma&#8217; &#8211; let&#8217;s take the Society back for the individual pharmacist!!! After all, the multiples have the CCA and pharmacy owners [...]


No related posts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have just cast my vote online for the English Pharmacy Board Elections. I have voted for those pharmacists who I believe will represent the interests of individual pharmacist and not those of &#8216;Big Pharma&#8217; &#8211; let&#8217;s take the Society back for the individual pharmacist!!!</p>
<p>After all, the multiples have the CCA and pharmacy owners large and small have the NPA and PSNC.</p>
<p>Vive le pharmacist!</p>


<p>No related posts.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pluk.co.uk/2010/dont-forget-to-vote/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NPA versus PDA</title>
		<link>http://www.pluk.co.uk/2009/npa-versus-pda/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pluk.co.uk/2009/npa-versus-pda/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 07:25:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shaun</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Default]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pharmacy News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pluk.co.uk/?p=80</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#8217;s an  interesting piece in the PJ this week about the differing views of the NPA and PDA over the  responsible pharmacists consultations and specifically the need to record a reason for the RP&#8217;s absence. Unsurprisingly the contractor dominated NPA want the RP to be able to leave the premises without ever having to record [...]


No related posts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s an  interesting piece in the PJ this week about the differing views of the NPA and PDA over the  responsible pharmacists consultations and specifically the need to record a reason for the RP&#8217;s absence. Unsurprisingly the contractor dominated NPA want the RP to be able to leave the premises without ever having to record a reason while the PDA want a reason recording every time!</p>
<p>The NPA is an organisation which is primarily there to support pharmacy contractors businesses. The PDA is the voice of the profession not business and should be the one that prevails in this debate</p>


<p>No related posts.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pluk.co.uk/2009/npa-versus-pda/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

