Tag: RP

Really important advice from PDA about Alliance Boots

| November 5, 2010 | 0 Comments
Really important advice from PDA about Alliance Boots

Please find a link below to the advice released today by the PDA about Alliance Boots’s interpretation of the RP regulations.

http://www.the-pda.org/newsviews/nv_topical_news1.html?id=2691

Results of C+D and PDA Union survey 2010

| May 24, 2010 | 0 Comments
Results of C+D and PDA Union survey 2010

So how does your salary, bonus and condition compare to your peers? The C+D and PDA have carried out a survey this year of over 2000 pharmacists.

Some of the interesting results include:

  • A remarkably similar locum rate amongst the multiples. Interesting!.
  • A 11% difference in salary for full-time employed men and women.
  • Big differences between multiples with reward to bonuses paid.
  • 88% of respondents stating that there had been an increase in paperwork in the last year.

For more information click on the links below which will take you to the C+D website (Please note, the results are found in two sections therefore you will need to click on both links below)

Salary survey 2010 part 1

Salary survey 2010 part 2

I’d be really interested in your comments about the survey

Shaun

RP Interpretations “unlawful”

| October 8, 2009 | 0 Comments
RP Interpretations “unlawful”

So Lloyds Pharmacy and Bupa have already have their interpretations of the RP regulations brought into question by the RPSGB (PJ Online article below)

http://www.pjonline.com/news/pda_claims_rp_rules_are_being_interpreted_unfairly

I guess that this was always going to happen with any new working practices but it will be interesting to see how the RPSGB respond. The problems have been highlighted by the PDA who suggest that the Society may have changed the RP guidelines in favour of the multiples. I hope that this was not done intentionally and that the multiples wouldn’t “place” people on the council to make sure their commercial interests are represented ahead of the professional interests of their employee pharmacists. Maybe I’m being niave  to think they wouldn’t as their main objective is to maximise shareholder (or owner) return. Linking this to the recent European Court Ruling

http://www.pjonline.com/forum/pharmacy_ownership_0

The PDA have shown that they are acting in the interest of the individual pharmacist. Is this an example of how a leopard never changes it’s spots and that the new PLB will still put bricks-and-mortar pharmacies ahead of flesh-and-blood pharmacist as it always seems to have done. I hope it isn’t because if it is, why should i join it?

RPSGB clarification on RP

| September 22, 2009 | 0 Comments
RPSGB clarification on RP

The RPSGB has issued further guidance on the RP regulations due to come into effect from October 1st.

http://www.rpsgb.org/pdfs/rprequirementsguid.pdf?dm_i=EQ,1Z85,1SSR5,6BFT,1

Call to action from Graeme Stafford to delay RP regulations

| July 28, 2009 | 0 Comments
Call to action from Graeme Stafford to delay RP regulations

Please find below a call to action from Graeme Stafford to delay the implementation of RP regulations. I think Graeme raises a number of points which need to be answered before the regulations go live.

Shaun

Dear Shaun

Please sign the petition asking for the postponement of the Responsible Pharmacist regulations:-

http://www.gopetition.com/petitions/postpone-the-rp-regulations.html

There are now less than 70 days until these regulations come into effect and will affect so many of us in our everyday professional lives.

If we are going to get them postponed we need to act quickly.

What seems so utterly wrong is that we will be made completely responsible without being granted any additional control over our working environments.

Will we suddenly be able to set staff and training budgets, choose which wholesaler to use, decide how we want to design and equip our dispensaries and write our own SOPs?

How many of us will be willing to risk our employment status by standing up to our employers?

Why is there no concept of Responsible Owners?

When the chips are down, when something goes wrong, when an error occurs,  who do you think will suffer?

If you have any concerns at all about the RP regs., if you want the Council of the RPSGB to take up this cause, if you want the Department of Health to listen

then please sign the petition as soon as possible and ask as many colleagues as possible to do likewise.

http://www.gopetition.com/petitions/postpone-the-rp-regulations.html

Thank you, as always, for your continued support,

Graeme Stafford

http://apjonline.blogspot.com/

P.S. If you have already signed I thank you but please do whatever you can to get more of your friends and colleagues to do likewise.