<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>PL-UK The Pharmacy Recruitment Specialists &#187; rpsgb</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pluk.co.uk/tag/rpsgb/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pluk.co.uk</link>
	<description>Pharmacy Recruitment Agency</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 15:53:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>New Awards from RPS</title>
		<link>http://www.pluk.co.uk/2011/new-awards-from-rps/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pluk.co.uk/2011/new-awards-from-rps/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2011 09:38:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shaun</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pharmacy News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA["pharmacy locums agency"]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hospital locum pharmacist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LOCUM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LOCUM PHARMACIST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NHS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PL-UK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PLUK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RPS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rpsgb]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pluk.co.uk/?p=1102</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The RPS have announced the launch of The Royal Pharmaceutical Society Awards. Text from RPS Press Release &#8220;Pharmacists from across all sectors of the profession are invited to enter the inaugural Royal Pharmaceutical Society Awards. There are seven award categories, designed to recognise pharmacists from all sectors of the profession and throughout all stages of [...]


No related posts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The RPS have announced the launch of The Royal Pharmaceutical Society Awards.</p>
<p>Text from RPS Press Release</p>
<p>&#8220;Pharmacists from across all sectors of the profession are invited to enter the inaugural Royal Pharmaceutical Society Awards.</p>
<p>There are seven award categories, designed to recognise pharmacists from all sectors of the profession and throughout all stages of their pharmacy careers.</p>
<p>The awards are an opportunity to highlight the achievements and recognise the successes of individuals or groups over the last year.</p>
<p>Those short-listed will be invited to attend an awards dinner to be held on 11 September at the Commonwealth Club in London as part of the RPS annual conference.</p>
<p>The seven RPS categories are: clinical pharmacist of the year; public health pharmacist of the year; leadership in pharmacy award; lifetime achievement award; academy of pharmaceutical science award; British Pharmaceutical Student Association student of the year; and preregistration pharmacist of the year.</p>
<p>An entry form can be downloaded from <a href="http://www.rpharms.com/rpsawards">www.rpharms.com/rpsawards</a> . The deadline for entries is 5pm 29th July 2011.  Successful applicants will be informed on 17 August 2011 if they have been shortlisted to attend the evening awards dinner&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.rpharms.com/pressreleases/pr_show.asp?id=119">http://www.rpharms.com/pressreleases/pr_show.asp?id=119</a></p>


<p>No related posts.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pluk.co.uk/2011/new-awards-from-rps/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why I decided to renew my RPS membership</title>
		<link>http://www.pluk.co.uk/2011/why-i-decided-to-renew-my-rps-membership/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pluk.co.uk/2011/why-i-decided-to-renew-my-rps-membership/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 10:10:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shaun</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Default]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pharmacy News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PLUK Company News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hospital locum pharmacist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[locum agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LOCUM PHARMACIST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RPS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rpsgb]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pluk.co.uk/?p=915</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you have read this blog for the last few months you will know that I have had my doubts about re-joining the RPS. I am still to be convinced that the Society will deliver what I believe is now it&#8217;s absolutely fundamental role now that it is no longer regulator &#8211; To represent individual [...]


No related posts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you have read this blog for the last few months you will know that I have had my doubts about re-joining the RPS.</p>
<p>I am still to be convinced that the Society will deliver what I believe is now it&#8217;s absolutely fundamental role now that it is no longer regulator &#8211; To represent individual pharmacists  and enable them to fulfil their professional ambitions. However, I am willing to give it a year to prove me wrong.</p>
<p>Pharmacists need a strong membership organisation whose voice will be heard in the corridors of power. The RPS already has the required contacts but are they effective at getting their message across? Not convinced. We also need an organisation that stands up for pharmacists at the very times they need support e.g. Getting a seat on GP Consortia or  in support of individual pharmacist when workplace stress gets too much. Again the track record is not great. I believe that the RPS has done far too much navel-gazing since it&#8217;s split trying to guarantee it&#8217;s own survival and that might come back to bit-them-in-the-bum when the final renewal numbers are confirmed</p>
<p>What they really need is a cause célèbre so they can show to existing members and those who have decided not to renew, that they can make a difference to their professionals lives. We all know that the RP regulations are being used inappropriately be a number of employers e.g. asking locums to sign retrospectively as the RP when work has been carried out without a pharmacist present and to make it even worse worse, asking them to do this without any pay!!! So there you go, a cause célèbre handed to you on a plate</p>
<p>So RPS you have a year. Please step up to the plate and make me proud to be a member. Focus on individual pharmacists and you will de well. Keep your focus on pharmacies and you will fail. Pharmacies have multiple representative bodies to get their corporate view across, pharmacists have the RPS and the PDA. Don&#8217;t let us hard working pharmacist down!</p>


<p>No related posts.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pluk.co.uk/2011/why-i-decided-to-renew-my-rps-membership/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PDA</title>
		<link>http://www.pluk.co.uk/2011/pda/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pluk.co.uk/2011/pda/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2011 18:04:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shaun</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Pharmacy News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PLUK Company News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facepluk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GPhC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hospital locum pharmacist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LOCUM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[locum agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LOCUM PHARMACIST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RPS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rpsgb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pluk.co.uk/?p=879</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m increasingly coming to the view that the PDA is the most likely organisation to make significant changes that will benefit all pharmacists. Ideally I want a combination of the PDA and the RPS, i.e.  has the focus on the individual pharmacist of the PDA and the union status and the CPD  and legal support [...]


No related posts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m increasingly coming to the view that the PDA is the most likely organisation to make significant changes that will benefit all pharmacists. Ideally I want a combination of the PDA and the RPS, i.e.  has the focus on the individual pharmacist of the PDA and the union status and the CPD  and legal support of the RPS (and by the way I know both organisations do much more)</p>
<p>The PDA are about to launch their long term vision &#8220;A new pharmacy roadmap&#8221; at the upcoming conference which is basically all I have always wanted in the role of a pharmacist. I think all pharmacists should try to attend the meeting and if you can&#8217;t like me, spend some time reading through the document after publication.</p>
<p>I believe the RPS is trying to make changes for the benefit of it&#8217;s members but I fear that they may be dragged down by the low standing of it&#8217;s previous incarnation.</p>
<p>I tell you what. Why don&#8217;t they get together to form a British Pharmacist Association!</p>


<p>No related posts.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pluk.co.uk/2011/pda/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Results of RPS renewal survey &#8230; and the Society is listening!</title>
		<link>http://www.pluk.co.uk/2011/results-of-rps-renewal-survey-and-the-society-is-listening/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pluk.co.uk/2011/results-of-rps-renewal-survey-and-the-society-is-listening/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 12:13:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shaun</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Pharmacy News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PLUK Company News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facepluk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GPhC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hospital locum pharmacist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LOCUM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[locum agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LOCUM PHARMACIST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[locum pharmacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[locums]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RPS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rpsgb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pluk.co.uk/?p=873</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Please find a link below to the results of the RPS renewal survey we carried out last week. It&#8217;s also pleasing to report that Patrick Stubbs- Director of Marketing and Membership &#8211; Royal Pharmaceutical Society has requested the results of the survey. I think he may be concerned by the proportion of responses that say [...]


No related posts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table id="content_LETTER.BLOCK3" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="5" width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<div>Please find a link below to the results of the RPS renewal survey we  carried out last week.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s also pleasing to report that <strong>Patrick  Stubbs- </strong><strong>Director of Marketing and  Membership</strong> &#8211; Royal Pharmaceutical Society  has requested the results of the survey.</p>
<p>I think he may be  concerned by the proportion of responses that say they won&#8217;t be renewing or,  will give the Society only one year to prove it&#8217;s worth.</p></div>
<div><a title="http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?llr=8qwcnhcab&amp;et=1104238445287&amp;s=1779&amp;e=001iTKgf_OLavC8c2pzqR_51aRiIvF66NGox1Q9CwpeUnZ_FDiDG5bo0_tLQEo_-zrlypLfNHBZERnZfCxK7zyNEI_dv7Bqq773k0a2Mvu2ADRhXE7thB84VTFNw9-RY5zIufFWXP5vWPAToNkRdB0uW4eCCdyYFTxoC1e7KQz6NvKg_LO0Lyzxw4VHfllc-tMa-DwAWkEWdhU=" href="http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?llr=8qwcnhcab&amp;et=1104238445287&amp;s=1779&amp;e=001iTKgf_OLavC8c2pzqR_51aRiIvF66NGox1Q9CwpeUnZ_FDiDG5bo0_tLQEo_-zrlypLfNHBZERnZfCxK7zyNEI_dv7Bqq773k0a2Mvu2ADRhXE7thB84VTFNw9-RY5zIufFWXP5vWPAToNkRdB0uW4eCCdyYFTxoC1e7KQz6NvKg_LO0Lyzxw4VHfllc-tMa-DwAWkEWdhU=" target="_blank">SURVEY  RESULTS</a></p>
<p>Lots  of pharmacists also left comments explaining why they had decided to renew/not  renew and please feel free to continue the discussion via the <strong>PL-UK  pharmacy blog</strong></p>
<p><a title="http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?llr=8qwcnhcab&amp;et=1104238445287&amp;s=1779&amp;e=001iTKgf_OLavCLy2jLtz2abgnbe9eVOvnUnIHuXJN-q1Isv-H0hf3Ry948p8kTTvhswjSrmp7Egwgl6F8iAn-J5kmcIhBNVGttpsKvKqNx56gcZRDCmrgF3XkbrFlf4ejRnAabHZs4kgKsXr-XIrrpcLruOIzvNgpx_thVoX_XxzA=" href="http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?llr=8qwcnhcab&amp;et=1104238445287&amp;s=1779&amp;e=001iTKgf_OLavCLy2jLtz2abgnbe9eVOvnUnIHuXJN-q1Isv-H0hf3Ry948p8kTTvhswjSrmp7Egwgl6F8iAn-J5kmcIhBNVGttpsKvKqNx56gcZRDCmrgF3XkbrFlf4ejRnAabHZs4kgKsXr-XIrrpcLruOIzvNgpx_thVoX_XxzA=" target="_blank">http://www.pluk.co.uk/2011/really-interesting-comments-about-rps/</a></p>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table id="content_LETTER.BLOCK4" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="5" width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<div>Again, many thanks to all those who took the time to complete the  survey.</div>
<div></div>
<p><strong>Shaun Hockey B Pharm (Hons)  MRPharmS</strong><br />
<strong>Managing Director -PL-UK Recruitment  Ltd</strong></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>


<p>No related posts.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pluk.co.uk/2011/results-of-rps-renewal-survey-and-the-society-is-listening/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Really interesting comments about RPS</title>
		<link>http://www.pluk.co.uk/2011/really-interesting-comments-about-rps/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pluk.co.uk/2011/really-interesting-comments-about-rps/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2011 12:34:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shaun</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[hospital pharmacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Locum Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Permanent Pharmacy Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pharmacy News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PLUK Company News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GPhC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LOCUM PHARMACIST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PHARMACY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PHARMACY LOCUM AGENCY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RPS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rpsgb]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pluk.co.uk/?p=857</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[- only because Boots are paying this years subscription. I will review my membership as and when Boots no longer pay the fee for me based on what the Society do for me - I don´t think is value for money. - I have to be a member of General Council and NPA and that [...]


No related posts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>- only because Boots are paying this years subscription. I will review my membership as and when Boots no longer pay the fee for me based on what the Society do for me</p>
<p>- I don´t think is value for money.</p>
<p>- I have to be a member of General Council and NPA and that is quite enough subscriptions.</p>
<p>- I will join this year and during the year I will make a judgement on the RPS being the voice of Pharmacists rather than the voice of cooperate Pharmacy.The RPS must promote the role of the Pharmacist and therefore the safety of the patient so the concept of the responsible Pharmacist must be examined as per conditions at the &#8220;coal face&#8221; of daily practice.The movement towards remote supervision must be resisted the strength of the Pharmacist/Patient relationship depends on face to face contact</p>
<p>- I shall be retiring from Pharmacy by the end of the year and see no advantage in being a part of this organisation which has hounded pharmacists and done nothing to support them in the 30 years I have been on the register.</p>
<p>- There are 2 of us registered at the one address so one of us will register and then see if it is worth renewing after that.</p>
<p>- I value the idea of belonging to a professional body which distinguishes me from another person who is not trained as a pharmacist.I find the Pharmaceutical Journal very informative and a way of networking with other colleagues in my profession.</p>
<p>- Sounds like an organisation for employers and employees whose subscriptions are paid for them. Will miss the PJ, though. Discussed this with 6 other locums to date &#8211; only 1 is renewing subscription.</p>
<p>- The Society need to be given the opportunity to represent us effectively.</p>
<p>- Might as well carry on with PJ and access to Law Dept which I am used to.<br />As a locum, I do not receive the mailings etc about what is going on, so more important to be kept in touch via PJ.</p>
<p>- mainly because not sure why not to, keeping to what i know is main reason and will assess position next year when get an idea of the numbers and opinions.</p>
<p>- They&#8217;ve been so utterly crap in the past, the new incarnation hopefully can&#8217;t (!) be any worse, so I&#8217;ll give them a year and review it after that.</p>
<p>- probably however if they don&#8217;t organise some local branch meetings before then i might not.</p>
<p>- Renewing for silly reason really&#8230;During this year I will be celebrating 50 years as a member..Can&#8217;t finish on just 49!!</p>
<p>- Not sure why really, like a comfort blanket I guess.</p>
<p>- I have already terminated it&#8230;</p>
<p>It looks like the RPS have an uphill battle on their hands as even the more positive comments above are not exactly a ringing endorsement of the would-be professional leadership body!</p>


<p>No related posts.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pluk.co.uk/2011/really-interesting-comments-about-rps/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A third of pharmacists not intending to register with RPS</title>
		<link>http://www.pluk.co.uk/2011/a-third-of-pharmacists-not-intending-to-register-with-rps/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pluk.co.uk/2011/a-third-of-pharmacists-not-intending-to-register-with-rps/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2011 15:26:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shaun</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Default]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pharmacy News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Locum Pharmacists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PHARMACIST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RPS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rpsgb]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pluk.co.uk/?p=851</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The figure of 1/3 of pharmacists not intending to re-register with the voluntary RPS is still holding firm in the PL-UK survey. I intend to let the survey run until next Tuesday so please take part in the survey before then and feel free to pass it on to other pharmacists you know. The more [...]


No related posts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The figure of 1/3 of <strong>pharmacists</strong> not intending to re-register with the voluntary RPS is still holding firm in the PL-UK survey. I intend to let the survey run until next Tuesday so please take part in the survey before then and feel free to pass it on to other <strong>pharmacists</strong> you know. The more <strong>pharmacists</strong> take part, the more accurate the picture will be.</p>
<p>To take part, please click on the link below.</p>
<p><a title="RPS survey" href="http://survey.constantcontact.com/survey/a07e3992u08giir5xrr/start" target="_blank">http://survey.constantcontact.com/survey/a07e3992u08giir5xrr/start</a></p>


<p>No related posts.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pluk.co.uk/2011/a-third-of-pharmacists-not-intending-to-register-with-rps/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

